Watch the oral arguments in the challenge to Mableton cityhood at the Georgia Supreme Court

Screenshot of plaintiff's attorney Allen Lightcap arguing before the Georgia Supreme Court in the Mableton cityhood case

Screenshot above of attorney Allen Lightcap representing the plaintiffs

The webcast of the November 6 oral arguments before the Georgia Supreme Court in White et al. v. City of Mableton, challenging the constitutionality of the referendum that created the City of Mableton, is available online by following this link.

Screenshot of attorney Harold Melton representing the City of Mableton

Background

Cobb County Superior Court Judge Sonja Brown dismissed the case filed by a group of plaintiffs challenging the legality of the referendum that created the City of Mableton.

The plaintiffs are Deidre White, Ronnie Blue, Judy King, Tanya Leake and Robert Swarthout.

The plaintiffs argued that the referendum wording on the ballot authorizing the city to set up a Community Improvement District (CID), violated the state’s single-subject rule (only one subject can be addressed in a referendum).

The plaintiffs were represented by attorney Allen Lightcap.

The city’s attorney in the case, former Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice Harold Melton, argued that the CID was germane to the city’s creation, was not a separate subject, and, therefore, didn’t violate the single-subject rule.

The two sides presented their arguments to Judge Brown in a hearing on March 6. Judge Brown ruled in favor of the City of Mableton.

Read Judge Brown’s ruling by following this link.

On Wednesday, November 6, the Georgia Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the appeal of the case by the plaintiffs.

Be the first to comment on "Watch the oral arguments in the challenge to Mableton cityhood at the Georgia Supreme Court"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.