Residents Consider Civil Action Against Sprayberry Crossing

dilapidated bowling alley storefront at Sprayberry CrosssingBowling alley storefront at Sprayberry Crossing with inexplicable packaged muffins in front (photo by Rebecca Gaunt)

Neighbors of the Sprayberry Crossing shopping center are preparing to take its owners to court. Last March, a community meeting with local officials to discuss the first property to be subjected to the 2017 county blight tax overflowed capacity of the Sprayberry High auditorium.

Potential legal action on Sprayberry Crossing

Some attendees expressed disappointment that since the bowling alley is the only parcel out of eight within the development to meet the official blight criteria, it is the only one that will be taxed at the increased rate. One member of the audience said the estimated $17,000 tax bill may not be enough to motivate the owners into taking action. Attorney Robert Madayag of Lee & Hayes suggested civil action by neighbors.

In July, Madayag sent a notice of potential legal action to the owners and their attorneys requesting that they resolve the issue in good faith. The letter states, “During the recent blight hearing, when presented with issues found by the County inspector, you repeatedly asked the County inspector if Cobb County has provided your clients notice of those issues. Based on your clients’ history with the County, if your clients were not aware of the issues, it is because they chose not to know. Your clients choose to sit idly by and allow Sprayberry Crossing to fall into disrepair. Rather than being proactive and taking responsibility themselves, your clients expect the County to solely take on that responsibility and tell your clients about issues on their property. This type of behavior is not what a contributing member of the community does. This type of behavior is what an absentee landlord does.”

According to the letter, potential bases for lawsuits against the Sprayberry Crossing Partnership and owners Thomas Garland and Mitchell Brannen of Brannen Goddard include economic damage to surrounding property, inordinate use of county resources to handle issues on the property, blight and inadequate security and monitoring. Brannen did not respond to questions by email.

An initial attempt at raising funds to cover costs of community legal action on CrowdJustice.com did not meet the goal in time. Madayag and community activist Joe Glancy attributed the lack of success to most of the more than 4,000 members of the Sprayberry Crossing Action Facebook group not seeing the link prior to the campaign’s expiration. They intend to redo the fundraiser.

According to Madayag, “funds would be reserved for those that want to sue but cannot afford the filing fees of the court. The second part would be to pay counsel (my firm) at a reduced rate to file the initial set of cases. Once we get those cases into the system, the goal is to set up the process for a second set of cases and replicate the filings, evidence, witnesses, expert testimony, etc. of the first set, thus reducing costs…We are fully prepared for a contentious fight.”

June magistrate court hearing

In June, the county argued to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Inmon that the bowling alley should be demolished. The property owners disagreed. Inmon adjudicated that the building is a blight, but is allowing the owners to seek a different solution.

Greg Hyde, who is opening an Edward Jones branch nearby, said he has concerns about the appearance of some of the other businesses in the area in addition to Sprayberry Crossing. “If you just leave it the way it is, it will attract a lower income population, and it will continue to really deteriorate instead of advance from the standpoint of an upper scale community.”

Bags of trash and other debris on Sprayberry Crossing property

Debris on Sprayberry Crossing property (photo by Rebecca Gaunt)

Last week members of the Facebook group complained of garbage dumping on the property and some members posted photos. One of the complaints was regarding an unregistered drop box, which was reported to code enforcement. According to Commissioner JoAnn Birrell, the property owners were cited and it has since been removed. Garbage in other parts of the property, including furniture, has also been removed. Police patrols are keeping an eye out for dumpers.

“Owning a destination store in the heart of Sprayberry area and having constant dump loads dropped of garbage right behind the building is quite degrading for not only the area but the neighborhood too,” said Brij Patel, director of marketing at Sprayberry Bottle Shop. “Customers have complained about it also and it doesn’t leave a good image for our growing and clean community.

Rebecca Gaunt
Rebecca Gaunt earned a degree in journalism from the University of Georgia and a master’s degree in education from Oglethorpe University. After teaching elementary school for several years, she returned to writing. She lives in Marietta with her husband, son, two cats, and a dog. In her spare time, she loves to read, binge Netflix and travel.

Be the first to comment on "Residents Consider Civil Action Against Sprayberry Crossing"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*