SPLC and two local law firms send Cobb school district letter of intent to sue

The logo on front of a Cobb County School District facilityCobb County School District sign (photo by Larry Felton Johnson)

The Southern Poverty Law Center announced in a letter to the Cobb County School District that they intend to file a lawsuit against the district, and stated that the suit will be filed on the basis of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

SPLC is joined in the lawsuit by local firms Goodmark Law Firm and the Law Office of Allison B. Vrolijk.

The Goodmark Law Firm’s focus is education, civil rights, and constitutional law. The Law Office of Allison B. Vrolijk specializes in law related to students with disabilities.

The letter states that their clients are students with disabilities, including students with underlying medical vulnerabilities that cause them to be “at increased risk of severe illness, and possibly death, if they contract COVID-19.”

Advertisement

In a press release issued simultaneously with the letter, the SPLC wrote:

Children with certain disabilities have a higher risk of severe illness or death if they contract COVID-19 or variants of the virus. Currently, attending school in-person in Cobb County Schools jeopardizes their health and safety because of the district’s failure to implement COVID-19 safety protocols, including requiring its students to wear masks. Students are expected to return from fall break on Oct. 4.  

“The district’s decision to not implement CDC COVID mitigation guidelines is causing parents of students with significant medical conditions to make an impossible choice: their child’s education or their child’s lives,” said Allison Vrolijk of the Law Office of Allison B. Vrolijk. “This unconscionable position can be easily remedied through measures taken by innumerable other school districts across Georgia, but the Cobb County Superintendent and School Board have chosen not to.  We hope that they do the right thing and show that they care about the health and well-being of all of their students.”   

The letter sent to the Cobb County School District

We’ve reprinted the letter sent to the school district and board members below.

Cobb County School District

Chris Ragsdale, Superintendent

chris.ragsdale@cobbk12.org

Cobb County Board of Education

Randy Scamihorn, Board Chair, Post 1

rscamihorn.boardmember@cobbk12.org

Jaha Howard, Board Member, Post 2

jhoward.boardmember@cobbk12.org

Leroy Tre’ Hutchins, Board Member, Post 3

thutchins.boardmember@cobbk12.org

David Chastain, Board Member, Post 4

dchastain.boardmember@cobbk12.org

David Banks, Board Member, Post 5

dbanks.boardmember@cobbk12.org

Charisse Davis, Board Member, Post 6

cdavis.boardmember@cobbk12.org

Brad Wheeler, Board Member, Post 7

bwheeler.boardmember@cobbk12.org

RE: Notice of Intent to Sue for Violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act

Dear Superintendent Ragsdale and Members of the Cobb County Board of Education:

We write this letter on behalf of our clients who are students with disabilities, who include students with underlying medical vulnerabilities, enrolled in the Cobb County School District (“the District”). Due to their disabilities, our clients are at increased risk of severe illness, and possibly death, if they contract COVID-19. Our clients are unable to participate in the District’s in-person education opportunities without jeopardizing their health and safety unless the District acts to prevent and mitigate these risks. To date, the District has refused to modify its policies and practices in order to accommodate our clients and excluded them from a safe and accessible learning environment.

The District has been warned by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”), the American Academy of Pediatrics (“AAP”), the Georgia Department of Public Health, the Cobb County Board of Health (“CBOH”), hundreds of community medical professionals, educators, administrators, and other personnel in the District, countless parents of children enrolled in the District, and some board members identified in this letter that the District’s policies and practices are unsafe and present unnecessary risk to students, particularly students with disabilities. The District knows that compliance with CDC guidelines, which have been endorsed by the AAP and the CBOH, including universal masking, contact tracing, enhanced ventilation, and effective quarantine policies, is the most effective way to create a safe in-person learning environment during the current pandemic. Indeed, the District complied with CDC guidance recommending these measures when it reopened last year, and the District argued the necessity of that decision in federal litigation in April 2021, a time when COVID-19 transmission rates were a fraction of what they are today.

Since the start of the 2021-2022 academic year, the District has willfully refused and consistently failed to implement policies and practices that comply with current COVID-19 safety guidelines established by federal, state, and local public health officials. The District has received hundreds of millions of dollars from the federal government to keep students safe during the pandemic and allow all students the opportunity to attend school in person if they choose. Additionally, the District receives specific federal funding to serve the 15,000 students with disabilities enrolled. Yet, when confronted with the significant risks of harm posed by COVID-19 to schools – and especially to students with disabilities – Superintendent Ragsdale and certain board members have refused to even discuss or consider COVID-19 safety precautions at recent monthly board meetings. And, once again, there is no mention of COVID-19 on the agenda for today’s board meeting.

By refusing to implement effective virus mitigation strategies, the District unlawfully excludes our clients from, and denies them the benefits of, an in-person education based on their disabilities – conduct which constitutes ongoing discrimination under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (“Section 504”). As policymakers for the District, this Board has the authority and obligation to ensure the District’s compliance with federal laws that prohibit discrimination based on disability and immediately remediate the discrimination experienced by our clients.

We ask that the District immediately adopt policies and practices consistent with CDC guidelines so that our clients and other students with disabilities and medical vulnerabilities can access the in-person education which they are entitled under federal law. Our intent is not to engage in costly and protracted litigation, but to ensure that our clients have equal access to an in-person education, consistent with their rights under the ADA and Section 504. We certainly prefer that the District use its time and resources to educate and keep its students safe. But, if the District is unwilling to reasonably modify its policies and practices to allow our clients the educational benefits to which they are entitled, then, next week, we intend to file a federal lawsuit under the ADA and Section 504.

With the safety and well-being of our clients and all students in mind, we sincerely hope that the District will accommodate our clients, immediately implement CDC guidelines for K-12 schools, and ensure that all students are not unlawfully excluded from a public education and have meaningful access to the District’s services and benefits. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

/s:/ Michael J. Tafelski

Michael J. Tafelski

Attorney at Law

o/b/o The Southern Poverty Law Center,

o/b/o The Goodmark Law Firm, and

o/b/o The Law Office of Allison B. Vrolijk

cc: Nina Gupta, Esq., nina.gupta@nelsonmullins.com

The Courier reached out to the Cobb County School District for comment. The district had not responded as of the deadline for this article. We have also left a message with the Nelson Mullins, the law firm representing the school district. If we receive comments from the district or their law firm, we will include those comments in subsequent articles.

Advertisement