Guns and children: The Cobb County School District meets Dunning and Kruger

Photo of the Keystone CopsThe Keystone Cops

[This is an opinion article by Larry Felton Johnson, Editor and Publisher of the Cobb County Courier]

There are things I am good at and things I am not. There are things I am trained for and things I am not. There are things I am qualified for and things I am not.

I sometimes attempt to do things outside my competency, but make it a point not to do it on life and death matters.

Which brings me to the decision of the Cobb County Board of Education to allow the arming of Cobb County School District staff who are not sworn POST-certified police officers.

Advertisement

A decision to put a gun in the hands of a non-police staff member is outside the competency of the superintendent. It is outside the competency of the school board. I don’t even consider the Cobb County Police Department qualified to train civilians to safely respond to emergency situations around children with the use of firearms.

And it is a very, very, very bad idea.

I worked for a couple of decades at a large public institution. When I began I was on a four-day-on, three-day-off night shift.

An unauthorized person was found in the building one evening, and an atrocious decision was made to designate us (we were mainframe computer operators) as part-time night watchmen. We’d do rounds twice in the evening.

On the face of it my partner would have been a prime candidate for arming under the school district’s policy. He was a Vietnam veteran with combat experience.

We often talked about the idiocy of us patrolling a large campus with no meaningful police training and no clear instructions.

I asked him what we would do if we encountered someone.

“We run,” he said.

What if they issue us weapons?

“We don’t carry them. We’re not police.”

I know that the policy contains language about training in both the firearms and in judgement.

But sworn police officers undergo years of training and retraining in both, much of it full-time, and yet even police officers make errors in judgement. The criticism of the Uvalde officers shows that under the best circumstances, things go badly.

It’s a near certainty that a librarian, a property management worker, a bus driver or any staff member other than a sworn officer is not going to receive enough training to be qualified to carry firearms around children, much less to respond to an active shooter situation without endangering themselves and the children.

Which brings me to Dunning Kruger.

Brittanica.com defines the Dunning Kruger effect as follows:

Dunning-Kruger effect, in psychology, a cognitive bias whereby people with limited knowledge or competence in a given intellectual or social domain greatly overestimate their own knowledge or competence in that domain relative to objective criteria or to the performance of their peers or of people in general.

Superintendent Chris Ragsdale is not a police official or a security specialist. As far as I know neither are the majority of the school board.

Yet they are playing at it, with a rapidly cobbled together policy with little detail about how the district is going to competently manage a deliberate proliferation of guns on k-12 school property.

This is bad policy. It’s one of those policies that’s so bad that I hope it’s just culture war puffery that will never be put into action.

Advertisement

5 Comments on "Guns and children: The Cobb County School District meets Dunning and Kruger"

  1. Karen Gibson | July 17, 2022 at 12:41 pm | Reply

    Thank you, thank you for writing this! As a former Cobb County Schools teacher and parent this should be posted everywhere.

  2. Well it’s a good thing your opinion is Irrelevant and you clearly have no idea what you’re talking about… snowflake

  3. As usual, a highly controversial policy— this one with potentially horrifying consequences we have already seen played out in schools across America—gets implemented in our Cobb County Schools with no advance warning, no public discourse, no review by public safety officials, no opinion from the head of Georgia’s POST certifying agency, and no comment or plans presented by the head of the School’s Police Chief. No evidence of any kind that this policy had received any input, review, or oversight by anyone who knew anything about safety and policing in public schools. No knowledgeable folks were invited to speak, and no data was presented. As usual, we were offered nothing more than the arrogant proclamation by our totally unqualified Superintendent, “because I say so,” supported by his little flock of board minions.
    And so it is. For Now.
    HOWEVER, this policy is potentially so reckless, so dangerous, so incredibly stupid, that it may finally awaken enough of Cobb’s placid voters and PARENTS OF OUR SCHOOLCHILDREN to take action to vote this Board of Clowns, and their Ringmaster Ragsdale, out in the upcoming election. This is not lousy purchasing practices, people, or fiddling with the district maps, or board members ganging up on each other, this is GUNS IN OUR SCHOOLS!! Think Uvalde, people, then get up, and get moving!!

  4. For all of the ink spilled on this issue, I have yet to see to whom these designated non-police security personnel will be accountable, particularly when one of them inevitably assaults a student.

  5. Drew is on target. This is such a good old boys gang who treat the school board as their own little balliwick regardless of who will be hurt or worse, put in harms way.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.